Enterprises now have the opportunity to achieve speed and safety by deploying AI with clear visibility and assurance of how it behaves in real-world conditions.
The challenge of achieving them, however, becomes even more complex as AI systems evolve from simple chatbots and voice bots within IVRs to fully autonomous agents. Unlike traditional rule-based bots that follow predetermined scripts, agentic AI systems can reason, plan, and take independent actions to achieve goals.
Autonomous AI – powered solutions go beyond responding to customer questions. They proactively analyze situations, make decisions, and take action with or without human intervention.
This marks a breakthrough in capability and efficiency, enabling smarter, faster, and more seamless customer experiences( CXs). But while it represents a significant leap in capability and efficiency, it also amplifies the risks exponentially.
In this article, we’ ll explore both the promise and the risks of LLM-powered and agentic CX applications for proactively testing, validating, and governing AI interactions. Thus ensuring innovation moves fast, but with trust and control built in from day one.
A RECIPE FOR RISK
Like the overachiever who raises their hand for every question, LLMs will always offer a quick, confident response: though their enthusiasm can sometimes outpace their accuracy. Research from Vectara has found that widely used LLMs like GPT, Llama, Gemini, and Claude can produce varying responses: with output quality shifting depending on the task and prompt.
In customer-facing AI( or agentic AI) use, this highlights the importance of building in the right assurance and guardrails, so organizations can confidently harness GenAI’ s potential while ensuring accuracy and trust.
And for good reason. The kind of confident improvisation noted above is much too risky. A chatbot that fabricates billing policies, product information, or medical guidance can erode customer trust, trigger compliance violations, and open the door to reputational or financial harm.
AI misuse, where an AI agent says something inappropriate, dangerous, or offensive, can also severely damage a brand’ s credibility and bottom line. LLMs do not inherently understand the regulatory and compliance boundaries that govern CX, such as GDPR and HIPAA.
One faulty decision from an AI agent can ripple across thousands of customers and lead to a wave of risk for highly regulated industries such as finance.
For example, instances have arisen where tax preparation software chatbots have advised users that they could break laws, such as withholding tips. This has drawn regulatory scrutiny and harmed consumers who relied on those unchecked AI responses.
With regulatory pressure intensifying, including the EU AI Act and the Federal Trade Commission’ s AI guidelines, risks such as the overcollection of personal data or unsafe recommendations will increasingly expose brands to potential breaches and penalties.
CX is not a place for improv or guesswork. By the time a GenAI response goes wrong, the damage has been done, and the window for customer second chances is constantly shrinking.
LEGACY METHODS WON’ T FUTURE-PROOF CX
Accuracy, accountability, and oversight must come first. In CX, that means no AI application should ever interact with a customer until it has been fully validated across every channel.
The truth is, legacy testing methods— manual, siloed, or even rule-based automation— simply weren’ t designed for today’ s AI-driven systems. Traditional scripts and workflows can’ t keep pace with the complexity and unpredictability of modern AI.
GENERATIVE AI
CX IS NOT A PLACE FOR IMPROV OR GUESSWORK. BY THE TIME A GEN AI RESPONSE GOES WRONG, THE DAMAGE HAS BEEN DONE.
GenAI and agentic AI represent a new breed of intelligence. Unlike deterministic software, their behavior is dynamic; responses change each time a question is asked. This variability is what makes them powerful, but also why they demand an entirely new approach to testing and validation.
With agentic AI, the stakes rise further. It’ s no longer enough to verify outcomes; we must also understand how and why the AI made its decisions. This transparency is critical for incident analysis, compliance, and maintaining customer trust.
The scope of this challenge is only expanding. Enterprises are deploying bots across every channel— web, messaging, in-app, and emerging AI-powered platforms— in dozens of languages and countless use cases. Manually testing every possible conversation path is simply impossible.
The future of CX will be powered by AI, but it must also be built on trust. That trust comes from rigorous validation, modernized testing approaches, and a relentless focus on accuracy before innovation reaches the customer.
Call to Action: We must ensure that AI doesn’ t just transform CX but elevates it. That means reimagining how we test, monitor, and govern AI systems. Enterprises that make AI accuracy and transparency a board-level priority will be the ones that earn lasting customer trust and ultimately lead in the new era of autonomous customer engagement.
EMPLOYING AI TO HELP
Quality assurance( QA) is evolving. Traditional functional testing and monitoring are no longer enough. Today, enterprises need CX assurance.
NOVEMBER 2025 29