MANY [ SURVEY ] RESPONDENTS REPORTED CONCERNS ABOUT LONGER WAIT TIMES, REDUCED SERVICE QUALITY, AND LIMITED ACCESS TO KNOWLEDGEABLE STAFF.
The nationally representative survey sheds light on public sentiment around government responsiveness, preferred support channels, and expectations in a climate of growing uncertainty.
Here’ s what Americans had to say:
• Phones are still the front door. Despite rising digital engagement, phone support remains the most trusted way to reach the federal government, preferred by 43 % of respondents, especially among those aged 65 and older( 49 %). Email( 25 %) and online chat( 17 %) followed, while social media was the least favored at just 1 %.
This data suggests that any cutbacks to live-agent phone support could disproportionately affect citizens who depend on it the most.
• Fast, effective help is expected. A majority( 63 %) expect their issue to be resolved the first time they reach out, while nearly a quarter( 24 %) expect immediate self-service resolution.
Younger Americans are particularly impatient: 34 % of those aged 18 – 24 expect instant self-serve resolution through digital channels.
Meanwhile, older adults( 65-plus) overwhelmingly expect to resolve their issue during their first live contact( 75 %) with an agent. According to one respondent,“ Many of us are older and need assistance fairly quickly. Those of us who have limited resources cannot usually wait for financial assistance when a federal check is lost, misplaced, or otherwise disappeared.”
• People are often disappointed. Most respondents( 71 %) expect to reach an agent by phone or chat within three to 10 minutes. For email, over half( 53 %) expect a response within two to three business days, while nearly a third( 29 %) expect it in less than 24 hours.
However, dissatisfaction with actual response times and resolution rates remains high: especially among older respondents.
• They’ re not giving up easily. When asked what they’ d do if they couldn’ t get help through their initial contact, most respondents said they’ d persist: calling again, emailing, escalating, or reaching out to a representative.
This signals both a tenacity born from necessity and a mounting frustration with current service systems. Some responses to this question included,“ I would continue to seek a response and try other approaches to get a response,”“ I would call back to get someone else or ask for a manager,” and“ Contact my Representative or Senator.”
• Staffing cuts are already being felt. Many respondents reported concerns about longer wait times, reduced service quality, and limited access to knowledgeable staff.
The anxiety is particularly acute among seniors and retirees: 52 % of those 65- plus and 53 % of retired respondents said they are“ very concerned” about their ability to get help in the future.
GOVERNMENT CUSTOMER SERVICE
One respondent said,“ I’ m a retired person on Social Security and I’ m deeply concerned that if I needed assistance from a real person, not a chat bot, that the help I needed would not be available.”
• Political divides shape perception. While service expectations were relatively consistent across political lines, concern levels varied: 54 % of self-identified liberals said they were“ very concerned” about cuts, compared to just 15 % of conservatives.
Liberals were also significantly less satisfied with current interactions than conservatives, suggesting that perception of service quality may be filtered through political lens as much as personal experience.
• Trust is eroding. Beyond delays and confusion, many respondents voiced a deeper concern: a loss of trust in the federal government’ s ability to manage these changes effectively. Some pointed directly to political leadership and what they see as mismanagement or indifference to the public’ s needs.
• The public has improvement ideas. Suggestions from respondents were clear and actionable: reduce wait times, improve staff training, and communicate changes more transparently. Many seemed to accept that resources are tightening but they expect smarter, more efficient service delivery in return.
WHAT RESULTS MEAN FOR LEADERS?
The message from American consumers is loud and clear: they’ re anxious, they’ re persistent, and they still overwhelmingly rely on and expect direct, human support, especially over the phone.
As government services retract, the expectation for private organizations to step in and step up will only intensify.
Our data shows a public that’ s worried, frustrated, and expecting help from someone. That“ someone” is often your contact center. Whether you’ re in healthcare, finance, insurance, or beyond, your agents may become the default frontline for confused or underserved consumers.
JUNE 2025 35